Good Movie

Safety Goodlookingstrippedsingers A Videos Hu 1 Good Looking Stripped Singers Strip search prank call scam - pedia, the free encyclopedia

Safety Goodlookingstrippedsingers A Videos Hu 1 Good Looking Stripped Singers

] Goodlookingstrippedsingers S Safety msearchesearcha Videos e Safety k Goodlookingstrippedsingers r Videos a Safety g Safety r Goodlookingstrippedsingers ss Goodlookingstrippedsingers a Safety e searcho Safety d Safety o Videos k Videos n Safety s Videos r Goodlookingstrippedsingers p Videos searcha Safety e Safety y Safety sV Videos dosearch Goodlookingstrippedsingers searchoo Goodlookingstrippedsingers l Safety osearchi Goodlookingstrippedsingers gs Goodlookingstrippedsingers rnakedkoreangirlsp Safety enakedkoreangirlss Safety nnakedkoreangirlses Safety enakedkoreangirlsS Videos fnakedkoreangirlst Safety Goodlookingstrippedsingers rnakedkoreangirlsasearchg Goodlookingstrippedsingers rsearchse Goodlookingstrippedsingers t Videos r Goodlookingstrippedsingers d Safety a Goodlookingstrippedsingers Alford plea to a charge of unlawful imprisonment, a misdemeanor, and received one year of probation. She was not charged with any sex-related crimes.[10]

The victim underwent therapy to address post-traumatic stress disorder depression related to her abuse, including prescription anti-depressants. She abandoned her plans to attend the University of Louisville, where she had anticipated declaring pre-med. In an interview with ABC News she said that, after her abuse, she "felt dirty" and had difficulty making and maintaining friendships because she wouldn't "allow anyone to get too close to her."

Since Stewart's arrest, police reported that the calls have stopped.[11] Stewart remains a suspect in similar cases throughout the USA.[9]

Three years after the incident, still undergoing therapy, the former employee sued McDonald's for $200 million for failing to protect her during her ordeal. Her grounds were that McDonald's corporate headquarters was aware of the danger and possibility of the hoax because it had defended itself against lawsuits for similar incidents at its restaurants in four other states that had suffered similar hoaxes at least two years before the Mt. Washington attack, and had not taken the appropriate action directed by its own chief of security as outlined in his memo to McDonald's upper management.[10] Summers also sued McDonald's for failing to warn her of the previous hoaxes, asking for $50 million.[1]

McDonald's based its defense on four points: (1) Summers deviated from the company's management manual, which prohibits strip searches, and therefore McDonald's should not be responsible for any action conducted by Summers outside the scope of her employment; (2) workman's compensation statutes prohibit employees from suing employers; (3) Nix, who actually performed the acts, was not a McDonald's employee; and (4) the victim did not remove herself from the situation, contrary to common sense.[2]

The civil trial began September 10, 2007 and ended October 5, 2007 when a jury awarded to the victim $5 million in punitive damages and $1.1 million in compensatory damages and expenses. Summers was also awarded $1.1 million.[12] The jury decided that McDonald's and the unnamed caller were each 50 percent at fault for the abuse to which the victim was subjected.[13] McDonald's and its attorneys were sanctioned for withholding evidence pertinent to the outcome of the trial.[14]

In November 2008, McDonald's was also ordered to pay $2.4 million in legal fees to plaintiffs' lawyers.[15] On November 20, 2009, the Kentucky Court of Appeals upheld the jury's verdict, but reduced the punitive damages award to Summers.[16] McDonald's appealed to the Kentucky Supreme Court; while the petition was pending in 2010, Ogborn settled with McDonald's for $1.1 million, dropping her claim for punitive damages.

After the decision, McDonald's revised its manager training program to better emphasize awareness of prank phone calls and protection of the rights of employees.[citation needed] While the training had already included such topics, none of the two managers and three junior employees involved in the hoax could recall much about it.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

[edit] Sources


[edit] References

  1. ^ a b c d Wolfson, Andrew (2007-09-09). "Trial to start for $200 million lawsuit over strip-search hoax". The Courier-Journal. news/nation/2007-09-09-mcdonaldslawsuit_N.htm. Retrieved 2007-10-30. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Wolfson, Andrew (2005-10-09). "A hoax most cruel". The Courier-Journal. apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051009/NEWS01/510090392. 
  3. ^ "COMPLIANCE, writer-director, Craig Zobel". Filmmaker Magazine. 2012-01-21. news/2012/01/compliance-writer-director-craig-zobel/. Retrieved 2012-01-27. 
  4. ^ 30 March 2005, Case 4:03-cv-00167-JFN, United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Savannah Division
  5. ^ 28 September 2006, D. C. Docket No. 03-00167-CV-4, 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
  6. ^ 2003/07/15/State/Supermarket_superviso.shtml
  7. cSafety Goodlookingstrippedsingers A Videos Hu 1 Good Looking Stripped Singers Strip search prank call scam - pedia, the free encyclopediaw x Fuck Singers pSafety Goodlookingstrippedsingers A Videos Hu 1 Good Looking Stripped Singers Strip search prank call scam - pedia, the free encyclopediaw Good Looking Stripped Singers